Consolidate environmental, social, and governance data into a single reporting workflow — aligned to GRI, SASB, and EU Taxonomy frameworks.
ESG disclosures require data from sustainability, HR, procurement, governance, and finance teams. Without a central workflow, each function gathers its metrics independently, using different definitions, timelines, and formats. The result is a fragmented, last-minute exercise that produces inconsistent disclosures and frustrates investors who expect comparable, decision-useful data.
Environmental metrics sit with sustainability, social data with HR, and governance data with company secretarial — with no single owner.
GRI, SASB, CDP, and EU Taxonomy each demand different metrics, increasing the reporting burden.
Different departments define the same metric differently — for example, "employee turnover" may include or exclude contractors.
Purpose-built capabilities — not generic templates you have to work around.
Map your data points to GRI Standards, SASB sector topics, CDP questions, and EU Taxonomy KPIs in a single workspace.
Assign metric ownership to the right department — HR for social, legal for governance, sustainability for environment — with deadline tracking.
Visualise performance across E, S, and G pillars with drill-down into individual metrics and trend lines.
Score each metric by completeness, quality, and assurance status so you know exactly where gaps remain.
Combine approved metrics, narratives, and case studies into a structured ESG report with version control.
Map required metrics to GRI, SASB, and EU Taxonomy KPIs, assigning each to a responsible department.
Each department submits its metrics through a structured form with standardised definitions and validation rules.
Sustainability leads review all submitted metrics, resolve inconsistencies, and approve for disclosure.
Assemble approved metrics, narratives, and visuals into the final ESG report — version-controlled and auditable.
Try these tools to assess and improve your operations.
The platform includes pre-built metric catalogues for GRI Standards, SASB sector standards, CDP Climate Change, and EU Taxonomy. Custom frameworks can be added by defining your own metric set.
Yes. Because metrics are mapped to multiple frameworks simultaneously, you can produce one integrated report with framework-specific indices or cross-reference tables.
SwiftCase supports both quantitative metrics and qualitative narratives. Narrative sections can be drafted, reviewed, and version-controlled alongside numerical data.
Yes. You can assess economic activities against the EU Taxonomy technical screening criteria and calculate turnover, CapEx, and OpEx alignment percentages.
See how SwiftCase brings environmental, social, and governance data together in one auditable, multi-framework workflow.
