Skip to main content
SwiftCase
PlatformForward-deployedSwitchboardFeaturesSolutionsCase StudiesFree ToolsPricingAbout
Book a Demo
SwiftCase

Workflow automation for UK service businesses. Created in the UK.

A Livepoint Solution

Platform

  • Platform Overview
  • Workflow Engine
  • Case Management
  • CRM
  • Document Generation
  • Document Extraction
  • Context Graph
  • Data Model
  • Integrations
  • Analytics

Switchboard

  • Switchboard Overview
  • Voice AI
  • Chat
  • Email
  • SMS
  • WhatsApp

Features

  • All Features
  • Claims Operations
  • High-Volume Operations
  • Multi-Party Collaboration
  • Contract Renewals
  • Compliance & Audit
  • Pricing
  • Case Studies
  • Customers
  • Why SwiftCase

Company

  • About
  • Our Team
  • Adam Sykes
  • Nik Ellis
  • Implementation
  • 30-Day Pilot
  • Operations Pressure Map
  • For Your Role
  • Peer Clusters
  • Engineering
  • Careers
  • Partners
  • Press
  • Research
  • Tech Radar
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • SwiftCase Signal

Resources

  • Use Cases
  • Software
  • ROI Calculator
  • Pressure Diagnostic
  • Pilot Scope Estimator
  • Board Case Builder
  • Free Tools
  • Guides & Templates
  • FAQ
  • Compare
  • Best Practices
  • Changelog
  • Documentation
  • Help Centre

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Cookies
  • Accessibility

Stay in the loop

Cyber Essentials CertifiedGDPR CompliantUK Data Centres

© 2026 SwiftCase. All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Guides
  3. Fire Safety
  4. Tracking Fire Risk Assessment Actions Through to Completion
Action PlansEvidence

Tracking Fire Risk Assessment Actions Through to Completion

An assessment is only as good as what happens to its findings. This guide sets out how to turn the action plan into tracked work with owners, dates and evidence, across every client the practice holds.

8 min readLast updated 2026-08-22Last verified 2026-08-22

After a Fire, the Question Is What Was Done About the Findings

The significant findings of a fire risk assessment are the part that is meant to change something. The assessor identifies a hazard, evaluates the risk and sets out the action needed, usually with a priority and a timescale. The Responsible Person is then expected to act. When something goes wrong later, the investigation does not stop at whether the assessment was done; it asks what became of each finding, who owned it, and when it was closed.

In most practices that record lives in the report and nowhere else. The assessor issues the action plan, the client receives it, and the next time anyone looks is the following year's review, when the same findings are often still open. Neither side can say when an action was done, who did it, or what evidence shows it was done properly. The assessor's name is on a plan that was never tracked.

The scale makes it worse. A practice holding a few hundred clients has thousands of open actions at any time, of every priority, across buildings it visits once a year. Without a system that holds the actions as work, the only view anyone has is the last report, and the last report is a snapshot of a day.

Findings Become Tracked Work, Linked to the Assessment

At issue, each significant finding becomes an action on the assessment case: a description a building manager can act on, a priority from the practice's defined bands, a target date that follows from the priority, and an owner on the client side. The action is linked to the finding that produced it and to the photograph that evidences it, so the context never has to be reconstructed.

The action then has a life of its own. The client is reminded as the date approaches. When the client reports it done, the evidence they provide, a photograph, an invoice, a certificate, is attached to the action. Where the practice re-inspects, the re-inspection closes the action with the assessor's own evidence. Either way the action ends with a record of what was done, by whom, when, and on what evidence.

Across the portfolio this gives the practice a view it has never had: open actions by priority, by client, by age; high-priority actions past their date; clients with nothing outstanding and clients with everything outstanding. That view is what lets the practice manage risk across its book rather than rediscover it one review at a time.

Every significant finding becomes an action with a priority, an owner and a target date, linked to its evidence
Clients are reminded automatically and can report completion with evidence from the case
Re-inspections close actions with the assessor's own photographs
The assessment case shows what became of every finding, so the review starts from the truth
Open actions are visible across the whole portfolio by priority, client and age
The record that an investigation will ask for already exists, in order, with evidence attached

How to Set Up Action Tracking Across a Client Book

Follow these steps to turn action plans into tracked work that the practice can see, chase and evidence.

1

Define priority bands with target timescales

Decide the bands the practice uses, what each means, and the target timescale that goes with it. Whatever the scheme, define it once, print the definitions in every report, and apply it consistently across assessors, so that a high priority in one building means the same thing in another.

Keep the number of bands small. Three or four that everyone applies the same way beat seven that nobody can tell apart.
2

Create actions from findings at issue

When the report is issued, each significant finding generates an action on the case automatically, carrying the finding text, the photograph, the priority and the target date derived from it. Nothing is re-typed and nothing is missed.

Write the action as an instruction, not a description. Replace the damaged intumescent strip on the door to flat 12, not door strip defective.
3

Assign an owner on the client side

Every action needs a named person at the Responsible Person's organisation. Record who that is on the action, and give them a way to see their actions, update them and attach evidence without emailing the practice.

A client portal that shows a building manager their open actions in priority order does more for completion rates than any reminder.
4

Remind and escalate automatically

As target dates approach and pass, the case reminds the owner, then escalates to the Responsible Person, each contact recorded. High-priority actions past their date should be visible to the practice immediately, not at the next review.

Escalation wording matters. A high-priority action left open is a risk the client is carrying; say so plainly and in writing.
5

Close actions on evidence

An action closes when there is evidence that the work was done: a photograph of the completed work, a contractor's certificate, an invoice, or the assessor's own re-inspection. The evidence is attached to the action and the closure is recorded with the date and the person who accepted it.

Decide which actions the practice will accept on client evidence and which it will only close on re-inspection, and record the rule.
6

Carry the status into the review

At the next review, the assessor starts from the action plan's real status rather than from the old report. Actions still open are carried forward with their history; actions closed are confirmed. The review then reflects the building as it is, not as it was.

Flag any high-priority action open at review for a conversation with the Responsible Person before the review is signed off.
7

Report across the portfolio

Give the practice a standing view of open actions by priority, client and age, and give clients a view of their own. The monthly question is simple: which high-priority actions are past their date, and what is being done about them.

Share the portfolio view with larger clients who hold many buildings. It is often the most valued thing the practice produces.

Best Practices

Write actions a building manager can do on Monday

The person acting on the plan is rarely a fire professional. An action that says what, where and to what standard gets done; a clause reference gets filed.

Keep the photograph with the action

The photograph that evidenced the finding is the photograph the contractor needs and the photograph the closure will be compared to. It belongs on the action, not in a folder.

Do not let the review re-date open findings

An action carried forward for a third year is a risk the client has been living with, and the practice should say so in the review rather than simply re-issue it.

Separate advice from verification

The practice advises; it does not usually do the work. Be clear in the record about whether an action was closed on the client's evidence or the assessor's inspection, because the two carry different weight later.

Measure completion as well as issue

A practice that can say what proportion of high-priority actions are closed within their target timescale, across its book, has a number that matters to clients, insurers and itself.

Keep the history when a Responsible Person changes

When a building changes hands or a manager leaves, the open actions and their history should go with the assessment. The Order expects the record to be handed on; the practice is often the only party that holds it intact.

Implementation Checklist

Priority bands defined, with target timescales, and printed in every report
Actions created automatically from significant findings at issue
Each action carries the finding text, the photograph, the priority and the target date
Owner recorded on the client side for every action
Client can see, update and evidence their actions without emailing the practice
Reminders and escalations run from the target date and are recorded
Closure rule defined: client evidence or re-inspection, by type of action
Every closure recorded with evidence, date and the person who accepted it
Review starts from the real status of the action plan
Portfolio view of open actions by priority, client and age
Free Tool

SLA Builder

Set turnaround targets for write-up, QA and issue, and timings for review reminders.

Try It Free

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Guides

fire safety

Fire Risk Assessment Workflow: From Instruction to Issued Report

A fire risk assessment is a legal record as much as a piece of advice. This guide sets out a workflow that takes a practice from instruction to an issued, defensible report, at the volume a working practice has to handle.

fire safety

How Often Must a Fire Risk Assessment Be Reviewed?

The law does not give a number, which is why practices get asked the question so often. This guide sets out what the Order requires, what triggers a review, and how a practice keeps hundreds of review cycles running without one slipping.

fire safety

Handing Over Fire Safety Information When the Responsible Person Changes

Buildings change hands, managing agents change, and the fire safety record is supposed to go with the building. This guide sets out what has to pass over, and how a practice that holds the record makes itself the continuity.

Further Reading

Workflow approvals: Reminders, escalations and closure rules that run from the action's date and priority.Timeline: Every reminder, reply, piece of evidence and closure on the case, in order.Context Graph: What was found, what was decided and what was done, kept together for the day someone asks.Building Safety Act compliance guide: The duties on accountable persons for higher-risk buildings.

Know What Became of Every Finding

Bring us a recent action plan and we will show you what it looks like as tracked work: owners, dates, reminders, evidence and a portfolio view of what is still open.

Book a Discovery CallSee the record it keeps